Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, has called on the international community to take a stronger, unified stand against Israel’s latest military offensive in Gaza. He warns that continued impunity and a lack of decisive action will only lead to further regional instability and humanitarian catastrophe.
A Growing Cry for Accountability
Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, has once again become a prominent voice on the international stage, issuing a powerful call to action against Israel’s ongoing offensive in Gaza. In a statement on social media, Safadi praised a group of European nations for their joint condemnation of Israel’s military actions and its announced plans for a permanent presence in Gaza City. This move highlights a growing frustration among Middle Eastern nations and some European states with the international community’s perceived inaction.
The unequivocal condemnation by the foreign ministers of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovenia and Spain of the most recent Israeli offensive on Gaza Strip and the announcement to establish a permanent presence in Gaza City must be supported by all members of the… https://t.co/EfeivqeFfx
— Ayman Safadi (@AymanHsafadi) August 29, 2025
Safadi’s message is a direct challenge to the status quo. He argued that the “impunity” with which Israel is acting is a “mockery of international law” and cannot be allowed to continue. He stressed the urgent need for “decisive measures” to end the severe humanitarian crisis, pointing out that a million people in Gaza City are facing famine and over 1.3 million have lost their livelihoods. His comments are part of a consistent effort by Jordan to draw global attention to the humanitarian disaster and the political dimensions of the conflict.
The Political Dimension: A War of Survival
Safadi’s criticism went beyond the military campaign, directly targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He accused Netanyahu of deliberately prolonging the conflict for his own political survival, stating that the prime minister “thrives on conflict.” This accusation adds a significant layer to the narrative, suggesting that the war is not just about military objectives but is also linked to Israel’s internal politics. Netanyahu is currently embroiled in a long-running corruption case, and many, including Safadi, believe that his political future is tied to the continuation of the war.
Safadi’s claim that a ceasefire agreement was “within reach” but was blocked by Netanyahu underscores the deep political mistrust that exists between the two sides. This suggests that while a resolution is technically possible, political will, particularly from the Israeli leadership, may be a significant obstacle. This perspective, increasingly shared by Arab leaders, frames the conflict as a choice made by a particular political ideology rather than a necessity for national security.
The Future: A Crossroads for the International Community crossroads
The Jordanian foreign minister’s call for global action places a spotlight on the future of the conflict and the international community’s role in it. The situation presents a crossroads: either the world takes stronger, more unified action to hold Israel accountable to international law, or it risks further regional instability. Safadi’s appeal to other nations to follow the lead of the six European countries is a direct attempt to build a coalition that can apply more pressure on Israel.
The long-term significance of this statement lies in its potential to shape international public opinion and diplomatic efforts. If more countries join in condemning Israel and imposing consequences, it could alter the dynamics of the conflict. Conversely, if the international community remains divided, it could embolden the warring parties and prolong the suffering of civilians. This news is not just about the present conflict; it is a critical indicator of the diplomatic struggle for influence and the search for a lasting and just peace in the region.
